(1) #5 Carleton College-Syzygy (15-5) NC 1

2265.5 (29)

Click on column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Effect % of Ranking Status Date Event
65 Massachusetts** Win 13-3 0 0% Ignored Feb 9th Queen City Tune Up 2019 Women
40 Michigan** Win 13-2 0 0% Ignored Feb 9th Queen City Tune Up 2019 Women
28 North Carolina State Win 9-6 -3.24 4.24% Feb 9th Queen City Tune Up 2019 Women
26 Georgia Win 11-3 8.36 4.37% Feb 9th Queen City Tune Up 2019 Women
1 North Carolina Loss 10-15 -9.46 4.77% Feb 10th Queen City Tune Up 2019 Women
38 Florida** Win 15-6 0 0% Ignored Feb 10th Queen City Tune Up 2019 Women
22 Tufts Win 15-3 13.47 4.77% Feb 10th Queen City Tune Up 2019 Women
16 Oregon Win 12-5 20.27 5.44% Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2019
50 Whitman Win 7-5 -20.22 4.51% Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2019
19 UCLA Win 11-3 16.48 5.2% Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2019
13 Stanford Win 9-8 -4.81 5.36% Mar 3rd Stanford Invite 2019
2 California-San Diego Loss 6-13 -26.83 5.67% Mar 3rd Stanford Invite 2019
4 California-Santa Barbara Win 12-8 27.42 5.67% Mar 3rd Stanford Invite 2019
32 Brigham Young Win 15-6 3.46 7.14% Mar 29th NW Challenge Tier 1 Womens
7 Western Washington Win 15-11 24.26 7.14% Mar 29th NW Challenge Tier 1 Womens
6 British Columbia Loss 12-14 -19.59 7.14% Mar 30th NW Challenge Tier 1 Womens
8 Dartmouth Win 15-11 21.12 7.14% Mar 30th NW Challenge Tier 1 Womens
24 Washington Win 15-9 9.43 7.14% Mar 30th NW Challenge Tier 1 Womens
3 Ohio State Loss 7-15 -37.89 7.14% Mar 31st NW Challenge Tier 1 Womens
1 North Carolina Loss 7-13 -22.54 7.14% Mar 31st NW Challenge Tier 1 Womens
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The results on this page ("USAU") are the results of an implementation of the USA Ultimate Top 20 algorithm, which is used to allocate post season bids to both colleg and club ultimate teams. The data was obtained by scraping USAU's score reporting website. Learn more about the algorithm here. TL;DR, here is the rating function. Every game a team plays gets a rating equal to the opponents rating +/- the score value. With all these data points, we iterate team ratings until convergence. There is also a rule for discounting blowout games (see next FAQ)
For reference, here is handy table with frequent game scrores and the resulting game value:
"...if a team is rated more than 600 points higher than its opponent, and wins with a score that is more than twice the losing score plus one, the game is ignored for ratings purposes. However, this is only done if the winning team has at least N other results that are not being ignored, where N=5."

Translation: if a team plays a game where even earning the max point win would hurt them, they can have the game ignored provided they win by enough and have suffficient unignored results.