#173 Georgia College (6-8)

avg: 534.42  •  sd: 75.91  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
183 Alabama Win 9-8 551.38 Mar 2nd Florida Spring Showcase
220 Florida Tech** Win 6-2 406.67 Ignored Mar 2nd Florida Spring Showcase
221 Florida-B** Win 11-1 347.04 Ignored Mar 2nd Florida Spring Showcase
211 LSU Win 9-5 610.96 Mar 2nd Florida Spring Showcase
183 Alabama Loss 3-3 426.38 Mar 3rd Florida Spring Showcase
33 Central Florida** Loss 0-11 1219.58 Ignored Mar 3rd Florida Spring Showcase
56 Florida** Loss 2-11 949.25 Ignored Mar 3rd Florida Spring Showcase
180 Auburn Loss 9-10 338.25 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
189 Georgia-B Win 11-7 860.36 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
102 East Carolina** Loss 3-13 572.52 Ignored Mar 16th Southerns 2024
119 Wisconsin-Eau Claire Loss 5-12 414.38 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
133 Charleston Loss 12-14 695.98 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
206 Georgia Southern Win 14-4 727.32 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
189 Georgia-B Loss 6-8 92.97 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)