#24 California-Davis (8-12)

avg: 1971.09  •  sd: 71.91  •  top 16/20: 6.5%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
23 Cal Poly-SLO Win 10-7 2360.95 Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
3 Carleton College** Loss 6-15 2106.55 Ignored Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
10 Washington Loss 6-10 1852.62 Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
27 Utah Win 12-6 2501.24 Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
6 Stanford Loss 6-13 1958.63 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
18 Victoria Loss 8-9 1996.36 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
14 California-Santa Cruz Loss 7-10 1790.57 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
113 Denver** Win 14-2 1664.82 Ignored Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2024
5 Oregon** Loss 4-12 2005.7 Ignored Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2024
15 California-San Diego Loss 9-12 1817.18 Feb 17th Presidents Day Invite 2024
55 Southern California Win 11-8 1921.7 Feb 18th Presidents Day Invite 2024
32 UCLA Win 9-7 2131.21 Feb 18th Presidents Day Invite 2024
69 California-San Diego-B Win 11-6 1969.07 Feb 18th Presidents Day Invite 2024
23 Cal Poly-SLO Win 9-2 2571.29 Feb 19th Presidents Day Invite 2024
32 UCLA Loss 6-9 1433.31 Feb 19th Presidents Day Invite 2024
9 California-Santa Barbara Loss 7-10 2032.13 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2024
2 Vermont** Loss 3-12 2189.63 Ignored Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2024
25 Pittsburgh Loss 5-9 1433.86 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2024
18 Victoria Loss 3-9 1521.36 Mar 3rd Stanford Invite 2024
32 UCLA Win 7-3 2451.87 Mar 3rd Stanford Invite 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)