#39 Pittsburgh Temper (6-10)

avg: 1624.71  •  sd: 66.29  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
31 Garden State Ultimate Loss 11-13 1447.28 Jun 24th Phantom Invite 2023
2 PoNY Loss 7-13 1776.4 Jun 24th Phantom Invite 2023
110 CITYWIDE Special Win 13-8 1663.91 Jun 24th Phantom Invite 2023
31 Garden State Ultimate Loss 10-13 1347.98 Jun 25th Phantom Invite 2023
12 Raleigh-Durham United Loss 4-13 1406.62 Jun 25th Phantom Invite 2023
38 Phantom Win 11-10 1749.98 Jun 25th Phantom Invite 2023
83 Red Wolves Win 10-8 1610.64 Jul 15th TCT Pro Elite Challenge East 2023
28 Tanasi Loss 7-14 1149.56 Jul 15th TCT Pro Elite Challenge East 2023
5 Chicago Machine Loss 8-15 1624.9 Jul 15th TCT Pro Elite Challenge East 2023
31 Garden State Ultimate Win 13-10 2004.26 Jul 16th TCT Pro Elite Challenge East 2023
27 Omen Loss 13-15 1525.61 Aug 19th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
13 Vault Loss 8-12 1563.2 Aug 19th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
26 Sprout Loss 12-15 1445.27 Aug 19th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
28 Tanasi Win 12-11 1857.45 Aug 20th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
12 Raleigh-Durham United Loss 6-14 1406.62 Aug 20th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
26 Sprout Win 12-7 2266.28 Aug 20th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)