#29 Pop (10-6)

avg: 1402.13  •  sd: 96.59  •  top 16/20: 0.3%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
60 Wicked Win 13-6 1322.92 Jun 24th Spirit of the Plains
54 Stellar Win 13-2 1476.94 Jun 24th Spirit of the Plains
81 Stormborn** Win 13-1 891.05 Ignored Jun 24th Spirit of the Plains
90 Twisted Womxn** Win 13-1 703.82 Ignored Jun 24th Spirit of the Plains
66 Banshee Win 7-3 1225.96 Jun 25th Spirit of the Plains
97 Minnesota Superior A** Win 13-1 576.66 Ignored Jun 25th Spirit of the Plains
37 Agency Win 15-8 1713.89 Jul 15th TCT Pro Elite Challenge East 2023
22 Siege Loss 10-15 1087.88 Jul 15th TCT Pro Elite Challenge East 2023
1 Scandal** Loss 1-15 2006.7 Ignored Jul 15th TCT Pro Elite Challenge East 2023
72 KnoxFusion** Win 14-5 1093.2 Ignored Jul 16th TCT Pro Elite Challenge East 2023
25 Colorado Small Batch Win 14-13 1584.47 Aug 19th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
12 Nemesis Loss 7-15 1331.46 Aug 19th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
11 Seattle Riot Loss 5-11 1384.62 Aug 19th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
27 Underground Loss 11-12 1300.92 Aug 20th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
34 Indy Rogue Win 14-7 1769.22 Aug 20th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
17 Ozone Loss 7-13 1128.86 Aug 20th TCT Elite Select Challenge 2023
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)