#115 Southern California (3-8)

avg: 1184.79  •  sd: 81.86  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
35 California-Santa Cruz Loss 7-15 1037.21 Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
6 Oregon Loss 7-15 1509.26 Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
65 Stanford Win 12-9 1750.3 Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
39 Victoria Loss 7-13 1028.2 Jan 27th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
67 Chicago Loss 10-13 1058.88 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
83 Northwestern Loss 8-13 839.32 Jan 28th Santa Barbara Invite 2024
79 Grand Canyon Loss 9-11 1091.49 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2024
6 Oregon** Loss 2-13 1509.26 Ignored Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2024
44 Tulane Loss 4-12 941.68 Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2024
151 Cal Poly-SLO-B Win 12-10 1272.06 Mar 3rd Stanford Invite 2024
160 Santa Clara Win 12-9 1338.4 Mar 3rd Stanford Invite 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)