#95 Wisconsin-Eau Claire (12-6)

avg: 1250.03  •  sd: 80.82  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
78 Carleton College-CHOP Loss 10-11 1223.94 Feb 10th Ugly Dome 2024
140 Minnesota-B Loss 5-13 478.04 Feb 10th Ugly Dome 2024
299 Minnesota-C** Win 13-2 957.54 Ignored Feb 10th Ugly Dome 2024
49 St Olaf Loss 10-13 1175.02 Feb 10th Ugly Dome 2024
124 Macalester Win 13-4 1746.58 Feb 10th Ugly Dome 2024
325 Carleton College-Karls-C** Win 9-1 812.24 Ignored Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2024
195 Grinnell Win 12-5 1446.06 Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2024
121 Iowa State Win 11-9 1404.27 Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2024
317 Washington University-B** Win 13-2 870.22 Ignored Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2024
83 Northwestern Win 9-6 1754.05 Mar 3rd Midwest Throwdown 2024
49 St Olaf Loss 5-9 974.11 Mar 3rd Midwest Throwdown 2024
124 Macalester Win 9-6 1565.14 Mar 3rd Midwest Throwdown 2024
78 Carleton College-CHOP Loss 8-13 852.78 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
250 Georgia Tech-B Win 13-6 1227.86 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
322 Luther** Win 13-0 848.06 Ignored Mar 16th Southerns 2024
78 Carleton College-CHOP Loss 11-13 1120.1 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
210 Charleston Win 15-2 1376.87 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
245 Georgia College Win 15-8 1212.17 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)