#45 Portland (11-3)

avg: 1684.91  •  sd: 108.59  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
- Stanford-B** Win 12-1 1160.45 Ignored Feb 3rd Stanford Open 2024
23 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 8-9 1846.29 Feb 3rd Stanford Open 2024
138 California-B** Win 13-2 1496.13 Ignored Feb 3rd Stanford Open 2024
48 Carleton College-Eclipse Win 8-5 2097.29 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
60 Colorado College Win 9-6 1936.99 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
139 Oregon State Win 11-5 1494.04 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
106 Puget Sound Win 8-4 1715.97 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
91 Lewis & Clark Win 9-4 1884.69 Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
44 Whitman Loss 6-8 1391.85 Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
44 Whitman Loss 3-7 1092.34 Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
139 Oregon State** Win 13-2 1494.04 Ignored Feb 24th PLU Womens BBQ 2024
- Pacific Lutheran** Win 13-0 600 Ignored Feb 24th PLU Womens BBQ 2024
106 Puget Sound Win 12-8 1592.31 Feb 24th PLU Womens BBQ 2024
106 Puget Sound Win 9-4 1751.16 Feb 25th PLU Womens BBQ 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)