#147 DINGWOP (10-10)

avg: 940.12  •  sd: 82.04  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
127 Nomads Loss 6-8 750.53 Jun 18th Spirit of the Plains
219 THE BODY Win 7-1 1131.59 Jun 18th Spirit of the Plains
103 Scythe Loss 7-12 682.57 Jun 24th Spirit of the Plains
204 Loaded Panda Win 13-5 1242.29 Jun 24th Spirit of the Plains
192 Minnesota Superior B Loss 7-10 338.59 Jun 24th Spirit of the Plains
73 Knights of Ni Loss 7-13 828.32 Jun 24th Spirit of the Plains
233 BeMo Win 13-3 1010.9 Jun 25th Spirit of the Plains
170 Rubicon Rapids Loss 10-12 592.06 Aug 19th Cooler Classic 34
148 Minnesota Superior A Win 13-6 1529.49 Aug 19th Cooler Classic 34
135 Trident II Loss 7-13 466.14 Aug 19th Cooler Classic 34
204 Loaded Panda Win 11-7 1109.18 Aug 19th Cooler Classic 34
127 Nomads Loss 9-15 535.54 Aug 20th Cooler Classic 34
131 NOx Loss 9-15 523.13 Aug 20th Cooler Classic 34
159 Choice City Hops Win 9-6 1303.21 Aug 20th Cooler Classic 34
16 General Strike** Loss 6-15 1336.6 Ignored Sep 9th 2023 Mens Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
96 Bux Loss 12-14 1067.9 Sep 9th 2023 Mens Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
236 Spin Doctors Win 15-12 671.4 Sep 9th 2023 Mens Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
194 UFO Win 15-11 1097.32 Sep 10th 2023 Mens Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
179 Timber Win 15-12 1111.04 Sep 10th 2023 Mens Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
106 MKE Win 15-11 1563.58 Sep 10th 2023 Mens Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)