#189 Great Minnesota Get Together (7-12)

avg: 566.89  •  sd: 71.27  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
159 Pandamonium Loss 7-11 318.96 Jul 15th Cheep Thrills 2023
182 Melt Loss 11-12 495.06 Jul 15th Cheep Thrills 2023
244 Underdogs Win 10-7 473.81 Jul 15th Cheep Thrills 2023
103 Bird Loss 3-13 437.54 Jul 16th Cheep Thrills 2023
235 Ca$h Cow$ Win 13-5 836.54 Jul 16th Cheep Thrills 2023
211 Lake Superior Disc Loss 10-13 118.64 Jul 16th Cheep Thrills 2023
135 Point of No Return Loss 7-13 303.98 Aug 19th Cooler Classic 34
179 Frostbite Win 10-5 1220.05 Aug 19th Cooler Classic 34
116 Jabba Loss 6-10 496.04 Aug 19th Cooler Classic 34
176 The Force Loss 10-13 323.73 Aug 19th Cooler Classic 34
159 Pandamonium Win 15-11 1167.01 Aug 20th Cooler Classic 34
165 Prion Loss 6-10 265.56 Aug 20th Cooler Classic 34
203 Locomotion Win 14-7 1096.44 Aug 20th Cooler Classic 34
103 Bird Loss 6-13 437.54 Sep 9th 2023 Mixed Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
236 Mad City Vibes Win 13-10 561.17 Sep 9th 2023 Mixed Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
145 Madison United Mixed Ultimate Loss 10-13 496.07 Sep 9th 2023 Mixed Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
86 Mad Udderburn Loss 5-13 521.14 Sep 9th 2023 Mixed Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
179 Frostbite Loss 8-11 280.54 Sep 10th 2023 Mixed Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
236 Mad City Vibes Win 13-6 833.02 Sep 10th 2023 Mixed Northwest Plains Sectional Championship
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)