#38 South Carolina (7-6)

avg: 1763.12  •  sd: 111.97  •  top 16/20: 0.3%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
39 Virginia Win 13-4 2338.89 Feb 10th Queen City Tune Up 2024
2 Vermont** Loss 3-15 2189.63 Ignored Feb 10th Queen City Tune Up 2024
29 Wisconsin Win 13-10 2241.76 Feb 10th Queen City Tune Up 2024
57 William & Mary Win 13-4 2144.4 Feb 10th Queen City Tune Up 2024
22 Notre Dame Loss 11-14 1741.83 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up 2024
34 Minnesota Loss 5-9 1289.73 Feb 11th Queen City Tune Up 2024
74 Harvard Win 15-6 1982.6 Feb 24th Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2 2024
112 Maryland Win 11-7 1534.23 Feb 24th Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2 2024
61 Penn State Win 13-7 2061.02 Feb 24th Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2 2024
12 Michigan Loss 6-13 1711.61 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2 2024
96 Chicago Win 7-6 1376 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2 2024
35 Ohio Loss 3-8 1198.14 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2 2024
52 Yale Loss 3-5 1175.48 Feb 25th Commonwealth Cup Weekend 2 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)