#202 Spring Break '93 (9-9)

avg: 660.13  •  sd: 85.72  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
189 Dirty Laundry Win 13-9 1166.73 Aug 19th Ow My Knee 2023
238 Mohawk Valley Wild Win 13-6 927.36 Aug 19th Ow My Knee 2023
209 Long Island Riff Raff Win 13-11 818.38 Aug 19th Ow My Knee 2023
189 Dirty Laundry Win 13-8 1244.33 Aug 20th Ow My Knee 2023
226 Buffalo Frostbite Loss 9-13 67.98 Aug 20th Ow My Knee 2023
238 Mohawk Valley Wild Win 13-6 927.36 Aug 20th Ow My Knee 2023
102 Harvey Cats Loss 5-13 607.19 Aug 26th The Incident 2023
70 OAT Loss 7-13 841.93 Aug 26th The Incident 2023
154 Odyssey Loss 2-13 294.28 Aug 26th The Incident 2023
209 Long Island Riff Raff Loss 9-13 170.97 Aug 26th The Incident 2023
235 Adelphos Loss 10-11 249.59 Aug 27th The Incident 2023
252 Deepfake Win 12-6 628.93 Aug 27th The Incident 2023
24 Blueprint** Loss 2-15 1164.52 Ignored Sep 9th 2023 Mens Metro New York Sectional Championship
252 Deepfake Win 15-10 503.22 Sep 9th 2023 Mens Metro New York Sectional Championship
94 Magma Bears** Loss 5-15 691.23 Ignored Sep 9th 2023 Mens Metro New York Sectional Championship
230 Bartle Boys Win 11-8 796.53 Sep 10th 2023 Mens Metro New York Sectional Championship
209 Long Island Riff Raff Win 13-12 714.54 Sep 10th 2023 Mens Metro New York Sectional Championship
94 Magma Bears** Loss 4-15 691.23 Ignored Sep 10th 2023 Mens Metro New York Sectional Championship
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)