#276 Whitworth (10-13)

avg: 846.13  •  sd: 54.45  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
235 Claremont Loss 6-13 395.21 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
239 Reed Win 13-6 1589.35 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
52 Whitman** Loss 3-13 1156.72 Ignored Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
173 Xavier Loss 1-13 633.43 Feb 10th DIII Grand Prix
291 Pacific Lutheran Win 10-8 1011.22 Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
178 Portland Loss 6-11 662.07 Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
81 Lewis & Clark** Loss 4-13 987.48 Ignored Feb 11th DIII Grand Prix
371 Boise State Win 11-8 722.37 Feb 24th Palouse Open 2024
154 Gonzaga Loss 3-15 701.37 Feb 24th Palouse Open 2024
321 Idaho Win 9-7 919.55 Feb 24th Palouse Open 2024
160 Washington State Loss 5-15 683.92 Feb 24th Palouse Open 2024
371 Boise State Win 11-8 722.37 Feb 25th Palouse Open 2024
160 Washington State Loss 4-11 683.92 Feb 25th Palouse Open 2024
178 Portland Loss 6-10 712.61 Mar 2nd PLU Mens BBQ
239 Reed Loss 9-10 864.35 Mar 2nd PLU Mens BBQ
335 Willamette Win 10-5 1144.44 Mar 2nd PLU Mens BBQ
361 Oregon State-B Win 13-2 1040.58 Mar 3rd PLU Mens BBQ
355 Portland State Win 12-8 932.34 Mar 3rd PLU Mens BBQ
291 Pacific Lutheran Loss 11-13 519.71 Apr 13th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
178 Portland Loss 7-15 608.77 Apr 13th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
52 Whitman Loss 8-15 1191.91 Apr 13th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
365 Seattle Win 15-7 1031.55 Apr 14th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
335 Willamette Win 15-11 951.71 Apr 14th Northwest D III Mens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)