#24 Utah Valley (11-5)

avg: 1968.86  •  sd: 95.83  •  top 16/20: 37.4%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
6 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 9-13 1849.41 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
41 California-San Diego Win 13-11 2021.15 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
58 Illinois Loss 9-12 1327.58 Jan 25th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
46 Stanford Win 10-7 2155.03 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
54 UCLA Win 10-5 2277.98 Jan 26th Santa Barbara Invite 2025
49 Chicago Loss 9-10 1623.65 Mar 15th Mens Centex 2025
96 Missouri Win 13-2 2077.57 Mar 15th Mens Centex 2025
14 Texas Loss 12-13 1940.09 Mar 15th Mens Centex 2025
50 Tulane Win 13-10 2057.26 Mar 15th Mens Centex 2025
58 Illinois Win 14-9 2146.81 Mar 16th Mens Centex 2025
57 Oklahoma Christian Win 15-6 2273.33 Mar 16th Mens Centex 2025
44 Wisconsin Loss 11-15 1396.06 Mar 16th Mens Centex 2025
366 Boise State** Win 11-0 946.35 Ignored Apr 19th Big Sky D I Mens Conferences 2025
156 Brigham Young-B** Win 11-1 1843.68 Ignored Apr 19th Big Sky D I Mens Conferences 2025
166 Montana State** Win 11-4 1811.12 Ignored Apr 19th Big Sky D I Mens Conferences 2025
34 Utah Win 11-7 2307.04 Apr 19th Big Sky D I Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)