#259 Florida Tech (6-3)

avg: 843.78  •  sd: 93.23  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
333 Florida-B Win 11-5 1166.66 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
278 Jacksonville State Win 11-6 1324.91 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
397 South Florida-B** Win 11-0 702.31 Ignored Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
372 Nova Southeastern Win 11-2 898.19 Mar 15th Tally Classic XIX
370 Morehouse Win 13-7 871.93 Apr 12th Southeast D III Mens Conferences 2025
185 Union (Tennessee) Loss 3-15 529.2 Apr 12th Southeast D III Mens Conferences 2025
359 Georgia College Win 15-8 957.54 Apr 12th Southeast D III Mens Conferences 2025
101 Berry Loss 7-15 862.45 Apr 13th Southeast D III Mens Conferences 2025
228 Embry-Riddle Loss 4-15 361.8 Apr 13th Southeast D III Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)