#188 Georgia Tech-B (9-3)

avg: 1117.81  •  sd: 76  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
126 Central Florida Loss 3-12 746.48 Mar 1st Joint Summit 2025
344 Clemson-B** Win 13-3 1079.07 Ignored Mar 1st Joint Summit 2025
252 East Tennessee State Win 12-9 1215.88 Mar 1st Joint Summit 2025
184 Georgia State Loss 10-12 896.39 Mar 1st Joint Summit 2025
344 Clemson-B** Win 15-4 1079.07 Ignored Mar 2nd Joint Summit 2025
252 East Tennessee State Win 15-10 1324.12 Mar 2nd Joint Summit 2025
168 Charleston Loss 3-10 607.88 Mar 15th Southerns 2025
359 Georgia College Win 10-6 888.89 Mar 15th Southerns 2025
233 Georgia Southern Win 12-5 1535.26 Mar 15th Southerns 2025
263 Georgia-B Win 8-6 1122.87 Mar 15th Southerns 2025
263 Georgia-B Win 9-5 1351.43 Mar 15th Southerns 2025
263 Georgia-B Win 15-9 1337.85 Apr 19th Southeast Dev Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)