#224 Georgia-B (9-3)

avg: 1039.36  •  sd: 111.5  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
196 Charleston Loss 8-10 870.87 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
215 East Carolina Win 9-7 1344.93 Mar 16th Southerns 2024
418 Wisconsin-Eau Claire-B** Win 13-2 600 Ignored Mar 16th Southerns 2024
78 Carleton College-CHOP Loss 3-15 1004.23 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
215 East Carolina Win 9-7 1344.93 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
265 Georgia College Win 10-9 1014.6 Mar 17th Southerns 2024
412 Central Florida-B** Win 15-1 308.31 Ignored Apr 13th Southeast Dev Mens Conferences 2024
248 Florida-B Win 12-8 1405.02 Apr 13th Southeast Dev Mens Conferences 2024
406 South Florida-B** Win 15-3 549.16 Ignored Apr 13th Southeast Dev Mens Conferences 2024
388 Ave Maria-B** Win 15-2 826.28 Ignored Apr 14th Southeast Dev Mens Conferences 2024
383 Florida State-B** Win 15-4 878.94 Ignored Apr 14th Southeast Dev Mens Conferences 2024
248 Florida-B Loss 7-13 406.33 Apr 14th Southeast Dev Mens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)