#146 Knox (8-10)

avg: 726.4  •  sd: 66.51  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
67 Illinois Loss 2-9 709.59 Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
88 Michigan Tech Loss 2-12 535.42 Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
210 Vanderbilt Win 7-4 777.72 Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
28 Missouri** Loss 3-13 1134.08 Ignored Mar 1st Midwest Throwdown 2025
97 Arkansas Loss 3-11 493.15 Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
67 Illinois Loss 6-10 813.43 Mar 2nd Midwest Throwdown 2025
124 Cincinnati Win 8-6 1212.45 Mar 29th Corny Classic College 2025
244 Notre Dame-B** Win 8-3 636.06 Ignored Mar 29th Corny Classic College 2025
200 Truman State Loss 4-5 311.94 Mar 29th Corny Classic College 2025
254 Purdue-B Win 8-4 455.1 Mar 29th Corny Classic College 2025
124 Cincinnati Loss 4-5 786.96 Mar 30th Corny Classic College 2025
135 Grand Valley Loss 6-7 690.26 Mar 30th Corny Classic College 2025
181 Michigan-B Win 6-5 661.74 Mar 30th Corny Classic College 2025
130 Butler Win 11-4 1445.61 Apr 12th Great Lakes D III Womens Conferences 2025
58 Davenport** Loss 3-10 803.44 Ignored Apr 12th Great Lakes D III Womens Conferences 2025
232 Kalamazoo Win 11-3 753.08 Apr 12th Great Lakes D III Womens Conferences 2025
130 Butler Loss 6-10 349.45 Apr 13th Great Lakes D III Womens Conferences 2025
232 Kalamazoo Win 11-6 699.78 Apr 13th Great Lakes D III Womens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)