(8) #215 Northeastern-B (15-6)

1015.78 (249)

Click on column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Effect Opp. Delta % of Ranking Status Date Event
133 Bates Loss 5-8 -7.05 266 4.67% Counts Mar 8th Grand Northeast Kickoff 2025
262 Brown-B Win 7-4 13.88 363 4.29% Counts (Why) Mar 8th Grand Northeast Kickoff 2025
399 Middlebury-B** Win 11-0 0 812 0% Ignored (Why) Mar 8th Grand Northeast Kickoff 2025
385 New Hampshire** Win 10-1 0 475 0% Ignored (Why) Mar 8th Grand Northeast Kickoff 2025
312 Amherst Win 8-4 8.35 289 4.48% Counts (Why) Mar 9th Grand Northeast Kickoff 2025
133 Bates Loss 10-15 -8.61 266 5.64% Counts Mar 9th Grand Northeast Kickoff 2025
223 Colby Win 8-7 4.85 276 5.01% Counts Mar 9th Grand Northeast Kickoff 2025
95 Bowdoin Loss 7-13 -6.7 276 6.71% Counts Mar 29th New England Open 2025
335 Connecticut-B Win 13-3 10.29 341 6.71% Counts (Why) Mar 29th New England Open 2025
375 Harvard-B** Win 13-2 0 239 0% Ignored (Why) Mar 29th New England Open 2025
318 Massachusetts-Lowell Win 13-3 14.13 227 6.71% Counts (Why) Mar 29th New England Open 2025
294 Northeastern-C Win 11-7 12.52 369 6.53% Counts Mar 29th New England Open 2025
312 Amherst Win 12-9 -2.98 289 6.71% Counts Mar 30th New England Open 2025
162 Brandeis Loss 7-15 -27.87 256 6.71% Counts (Why) Mar 30th New England Open 2025
281 Worcester Polytechnic Win 15-6 25.04 350 6.71% Counts (Why) Mar 30th New England Open 2025
411 Boston University-B** Win 12-3 0 97 0% Ignored (Why) Apr 12th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
262 Brown-B Win 10-7 15.56 363 7.12% Counts Apr 12th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
375 Harvard-B** Win 15-1 0 239 0% Ignored (Why) Apr 12th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
111 Vermont-B Loss 7-11 -5.09 224 7.33% Counts Apr 12th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
262 Brown-B Win 11-9 5.08 363 7.53% Counts Apr 13th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
294 Northeastern-C Loss 7-10 -51.95 369 7.12% Counts Apr 13th New England Dev Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible. Learn more about how this works here.

FAQ

The results on this page ("USAU") are the results of an implementation of the USA Ultimate Top 20 algorithm, which is used to allocate post season bids to both colleg and club ultimate teams. The data was obtained by scraping USAU's score reporting website. Learn more about the algorithm here. TL;DR, here is the rating function. Every game a team plays gets a rating equal to the opponents rating +/- the score value. With all these data points, we iterate team ratings until convergence. There is also a rule for discounting blowout games (see next FAQ)
For reference, here is handy table with frequent game scrores and the resulting game value:
"...if a team is rated more than 600 points higher than its opponent, and wins with a score that is more than twice the losing score plus one, the game is ignored for ratings purposes. However, this is only done if the winning team has at least N other results that are not being ignored, where N=5."

Translation: if a team plays a game where even earning the max point win would hurt them, they can have the game ignored provided they win by enough and have suffficient unignored results.