(2) #170 Miami (Florida) (16-15)

609.35 (201)

Click on column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Effect Opp. Delta % of Ranking Status Date Event
172 Florida State Loss 6-7 -3.42 247 2.49% Counts Jan 25th Florida Winter Classic 2025
237 Florida-B Win 10-2 2.02 152 2.63% Counts (Why) Jan 25th Florida Winter Classic 2025
33 Georgia Tech** Loss 1-13 0 408 0% Ignored (Why) Jan 25th Florida Winter Classic 2025
59 Central Florida** Loss 0-12 0 161 0% Ignored (Why) Jan 26th Florida Winter Classic 2025
237 Florida-B Win 8-4 0.97 152 2.39% Counts (Why) Jan 26th Florida Winter Classic 2025
157 Georgia Southern Win 12-4 19.78 17 2.89% Counts (Why) Jan 26th Florida Winter Classic 2025
221 Florida Tech Win 7-5 -1.76 321 2.69% Counts Feb 8th Tropical Toss up
248 South Florida Win 13-2 0.2 86 3.38% Counts (Why) Feb 8th Tropical Toss up
252 American-B Win 7-4 -5.45 273 3.06% Counts (Why) Mar 1st Cherry Blossom Classic 2025
167 East Carolina Loss 7-8 -4.01 230 3.57% Counts Mar 1st Cherry Blossom Classic 2025
36 Haverford/Bryn Mawr** Loss 0-13 0 225 0% Ignored (Why) Mar 1st Cherry Blossom Classic 2025
207 Towson Win 7-4 5.96 291 3.06% Counts (Why) Mar 1st Cherry Blossom Classic 2025
167 East Carolina Win 4-3 3.55 230 2.44% Counts (Why) Mar 2nd Cherry Blossom Classic 2025
98 Lehigh Loss 5-9 -1.72 186 3.45% Counts Mar 2nd Cherry Blossom Classic 2025
53 Maryland** Loss 1-11 0 242 0% Ignored (Why) Mar 2nd Cherry Blossom Classic 2025
240 Connecticut College Win 9-8 -20.58 263 4.79% Counts Mar 29th Northeast Classic 2025
149 Dartmouth Loss 3-9 -21.91 412 4.19% Counts (Why) Mar 29th Northeast Classic 2025
183 Vermont-C Loss 4-5 -7.53 209 3.49% Counts Mar 29th Northeast Classic 2025
226 SUNY-Cortland Win 10-3 8.97 230 4.42% Counts (Why) Mar 30th Northeast Classic 2025
204 Vassar Win 10-7 8.47 196 4.79% Counts Mar 30th Northeast Classic 2025
65 Florida** Loss 5-13 0 284 0% Ignored (Why) Apr 12th Florida D I Womens Conferences 2025
221 Florida Tech Win 7-4 4.71 321 4.33% Counts (Why) Apr 12th Florida D I Womens Conferences 2025
172 Florida State Loss 6-9 -22.74 247 5.05% Counts Apr 13th Florida D I Womens Conferences 2025
237 Florida-B Win 13-7 1.95 152 5.68% Counts (Why) Apr 13th Florida D I Womens Conferences 2025
248 South Florida Win 15-0 0.35 86 5.68% Counts (Why) Apr 13th Florida D I Womens Conferences 2025
234 Auburn Win 15-5 7.91 242 6.38% Counts (Why) Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
65 Florida** Loss 4-15 0 284 0% Ignored (Why) Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
82 Tennessee Loss 4-15 -0.86 282 6.38% Counts (Why) Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
203 Tennessee-Chattanooga Win 14-2 26.32 216 6.38% Counts (Why) Apr 26th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
33 Georgia Tech** Loss 4-15 0 408 0% Ignored (Why) Apr 27th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
82 Tennessee Loss 7-15 -0.86 282 6.38% Counts (Why) Apr 27th Southeast D I College Womens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible. Learn more about how this works here.

FAQ

The results on this page ("USAU") are the results of an implementation of the USA Ultimate Top 20 algorithm, which is used to allocate post season bids to both colleg and club ultimate teams. The data was obtained by scraping USAU's score reporting website. Learn more about the algorithm here. TL;DR, here is the rating function. Every game a team plays gets a rating equal to the opponents rating +/- the score value. With all these data points, we iterate team ratings until convergence. There is also a rule for discounting blowout games (see next FAQ)
For reference, here is handy table with frequent game scrores and the resulting game value:
"...if a team is rated more than 600 points higher than its opponent, and wins with a score that is more than twice the losing score plus one, the game is ignored for ratings purposes. However, this is only done if the winning team has at least N other results that are not being ignored, where N=5."

Translation: if a team plays a game where even earning the max point win would hurt them, they can have the game ignored provided they win by enough and have suffficient unignored results.