(1) #40 California (17-15)

1581.88 (285)

Click on column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Effect Opp. Delta % of Ranking Status Date Event
114 Arizona State Win 8-4 -1.3 240 2.08% Counts (Why) Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
13 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 1-11 -2.51 363 2.4% Counts (Why) Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
249 California-San Diego-C** Win 13-0 0 404 0% Ignored (Why) Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
83 California-Irvine Win 7-6 -5.79 448 2.16% Counts Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
180 Arizona** Win 11-3 0 317 0% Ignored (Why) Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
30 UCLA Loss 5-11 -11.39 415 2.4% Counts (Why) Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
83 California-Irvine Win 8-5 1.47 448 2.16% Counts (Why) Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
10 California-San Diego Loss 6-11 -0.48 382 3.12% Counts Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
7 Washington Loss 10-13 9.51 338 3.29% Counts Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
31 Pittsburgh Win 10-9 7.98 323 3.29% Counts Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
14 California-Santa Barbara Loss 7-12 -1.1 234 3.29% Counts Mar 1st Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
30 UCLA Loss 6-9 -8.51 415 2.93% Counts Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
35 Wisconsin Loss 7-8 -2.22 390 2.93% Counts Mar 2nd Stanford Invite 2025 Womens
205 Texas A&M** Win 13-2 0 244 0% Ignored (Why) Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
136 Trinity** Win 13-5 0 229 0% Ignored (Why) Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
44 Washington University Loss 8-9 -5.53 175 3.71% Counts Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
106 San Diego State Win 15-10 -3.61 356 3.92% Counts Mar 22nd Womens Centex 2025
27 Texas Loss 11-15 -7.84 358 3.92% Counts Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
67 Illinois Win 15-3 13.36 129 3.92% Counts (Why) Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
44 Washington University Win 12-11 4.33 175 3.92% Counts Mar 23rd Womens Centex 2025
15 California-Santa Cruz Loss 7-13 -4.67 433 4.66% Counts Apr 12th NorCal D I Womens Conferences 2025
68 Santa Clara Win 12-11 -7.66 287 4.66% Counts Apr 12th NorCal D I Womens Conferences 2025
219 Cal Poly-Humboldt** Win 15-2 0 287 0% Ignored (Why) Apr 13th NorCal D I Womens Conferences 2025
178 Nevada-Reno** Win 15-2 0 241 0% Ignored (Why) Apr 13th NorCal D I Womens Conferences 2025
23 California-Davis Win 10-9 20.73 426 4.66% Counts Apr 13th NorCal D I Womens Conferences 2025
13 Cal Poly-SLO Loss 8-13 0.1 363 5.23% Counts Apr 26th Southwest D I College Womens Regionals 2025
68 Santa Clara Win 15-11 5.48 287 5.23% Counts Apr 26th Southwest D I College Womens Regionals 2025
14 California-Santa Barbara Loss 5-15 -6.17 234 5.23% Counts (Why) Apr 26th Southwest D I College Womens Regionals 2025
23 California-Davis Loss 9-10 9.61 426 5.23% Counts Apr 26th Southwest D I College Womens Regionals 2025
41 Southern California Loss 9-12 -19.51 269 5.23% Counts Apr 27th Southwest D I College Womens Regionals 2025
68 Santa Clara Win 15-8 15.61 287 5.23% Counts (Why) Apr 27th Southwest D I College Womens Regionals 2025
30 UCLA Loss 12-13 0.63 415 5.23% Counts Apr 27th Southwest D I College Womens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible. Learn more about how this works here.

FAQ

The results on this page ("USAU") are the results of an implementation of the USA Ultimate Top 20 algorithm, which is used to allocate post season bids to both colleg and club ultimate teams. The data was obtained by scraping USAU's score reporting website. Learn more about the algorithm here. TL;DR, here is the rating function. Every game a team plays gets a rating equal to the opponents rating +/- the score value. With all these data points, we iterate team ratings until convergence. There is also a rule for discounting blowout games (see next FAQ)
For reference, here is handy table with frequent game scrores and the resulting game value:
"...if a team is rated more than 600 points higher than its opponent, and wins with a score that is more than twice the losing score plus one, the game is ignored for ratings purposes. However, this is only done if the winning team has at least N other results that are not being ignored, where N=5."

Translation: if a team plays a game where even earning the max point win would hurt them, they can have the game ignored provided they win by enough and have suffficient unignored results.