#303 Tennessee Tech (1-11)

avg: 671.79  •  sd: 82.21  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
101 Berry Loss 7-13 904.91 Feb 8th Bulldog Brawl
196 Kennesaw State Loss 7-12 562.14 Feb 8th Bulldog Brawl
320 Mississippi State-B Win 10-9 728.09 Feb 8th Bulldog Brawl
87 Missouri S&T** Loss 2-13 907.58 Ignored Feb 8th Bulldog Brawl
122 Clemson** Loss 6-15 761.6 Ignored Feb 9th Bulldog Brawl
190 Vanderbilt Loss 7-15 506.32 Feb 9th Bulldog Brawl
185 Union (Tennessee) Loss 9-15 613.72 Feb 9th Bulldog Brawl
18 Georgia** Loss 0-13 1438.84 Ignored Apr 12th Southern Appalachian D I Mens Conferences 2025
184 Georgia State Loss 7-10 744.84 Apr 12th Southern Appalachian D I Mens Conferences 2025
82 Tennessee Loss 6-13 945.96 Apr 12th Southern Appalachian D I Mens Conferences 2025
98 Tennessee-Chattanooga** Loss 3-13 872.22 Ignored Apr 12th Southern Appalachian D I Mens Conferences 2025
252 East Tennessee State Loss 9-15 355.03 Apr 13th Southern Appalachian D I Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)