#247 Northern Arizona (6-8)

avg: 965.2  •  sd: 54.5  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
350 Arizona State-B Win 13-6 1111.42 Jan 27th New Year Fest 40
101 Colorado Mines Loss 6-13 912.08 Jan 27th New Year Fest 40
381 Denver-B** Win 13-4 887.78 Ignored Jan 27th New Year Fest 40
58 Utah Valley** Loss 5-13 1137.54 Ignored Jan 27th New Year Fest 40
156 Denver Loss 4-13 696.21 Jan 28th New Year Fest 40
137 Kansas Loss 2-13 765.35 Jan 28th New Year Fest 40
371 Boise State** Win 11-2 956.76 Ignored Mar 9th Big Sky Brawl 2024
288 Montana Win 8-7 905.85 Mar 9th Big Sky Brawl 2024
328 Nevada-Reno Win 8-3 1202 Mar 9th Big Sky Brawl 2024
58 Utah Valley** Loss 3-9 1137.54 Ignored Mar 9th Big Sky Brawl 2024
288 Montana Win 10-5 1354.75 Mar 10th Big Sky Brawl 2024
58 Utah Valley** Loss 1-13 1137.54 Ignored Mar 10th Big Sky Brawl 2024
219 Arizona Loss 9-13 633.92 Apr 14th Desert D I Mens Conferences 2024
133 Arizona State Loss 10-12 1136.97 Apr 14th Desert D I Mens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)