#344 Chico State (3-12)

avg: 540.15  •  sd: 94.24  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
230 California-Davis Loss 2-13 415.39 Feb 3rd Stanford Open 2024
192 Loyola Marymount** Loss 2-13 555.9 Ignored Feb 3rd Stanford Open 2024
144 Santa Clara** Loss 3-13 736.2 Ignored Feb 3rd Stanford Open 2024
334 California-Santa Barbara-B Loss 5-12 -18.61 Mar 9th Silicon Valley Rally 2024
354 California-Santa Cruz-B Win 11-7 958.22 Mar 9th Silicon Valley Rally 2024
158 UCLA-B Loss 7-12 768.56 Mar 9th Silicon Valley Rally 2024
338 Cal Poly-Humboldt Win 13-3 1163.56 Mar 10th Silicon Valley Rally 2024
230 California-Davis Loss 4-13 415.39 Mar 10th Silicon Valley Rally 2024
354 California-Santa Cruz-B Loss 9-10 366.33 Mar 10th Silicon Valley Rally 2024
338 Cal Poly-Humboldt Loss 9-15 48.08 Apr 13th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2024
33 California-Santa Cruz** Loss 2-15 1307.18 Ignored Apr 13th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2024
124 San Jose State** Loss 4-13 792.34 Ignored Apr 13th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2024
144 Santa Clara** Loss 5-14 736.2 Ignored Apr 13th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2024
230 California-Davis Loss 9-13 596.82 Apr 14th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2024
328 Nevada-Reno Win 13-12 727 Apr 14th NorCal D I Mens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)