#83 Simon Fraser (6-4)

avg: 1542.33  •  sd: 125.22  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
2 Oregon** Loss 4-15 1785.23 Ignored Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
11 Oregon State Loss 2-15 1535.73 Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
23 Western Washington Loss 13-14 1863.28 Jan 25th Pac Con 2025
200 Cal Poly-Humboldt Loss 10-15 611.21 Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
224 Oregon-B Win 14-9 1450.26 Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
378 Portland State** Win 15-4 858.56 Ignored Jan 26th Pac Con 2025
104 British Columbia -B Win 14-12 1672.46 Mar 29th Northwest Challenge D3
250 Portland** Win 15-6 1483.73 Ignored Mar 29th Northwest Challenge D3
104 British Columbia -B Win 12-10 1689.62 Mar 30th Northwest Challenge D3
139 Puget Sound Win 15-11 1686.48 Mar 30th Northwest Challenge D3
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)