#33 Union (Tennessee) (20-2)

avg: 1801.17  •  sd: 128.88  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
202 Alabama** Win 11-2 1034.07 Ignored Feb 10th College Womens Huckfest
233 Alabama-Birmingham** Win 11-3 686.05 Ignored Feb 10th College Womens Huckfest
80 Cincinnati Win 9-4 1954.51 Feb 10th College Womens Huckfest
129 Illinois** Win 11-3 1637.5 Ignored Feb 10th College Womens Huckfest
31 Alabama-Huntsville Win 7-4 2328.26 Feb 11th College Womens Huckfest
31 Alabama-Huntsville Loss 10-11 1707.1 Feb 11th College Womens Huckfest
211 Vanderbilt** Win 11-3 932.2 Ignored Feb 11th College Womens Huckfest
162 Emory** Win 12-1 1416.03 Ignored Feb 24th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
218 Georgia-B** Win 12-3 884.36 Ignored Feb 24th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
129 Illinois** Win 11-4 1637.5 Ignored Feb 24th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
91 Tennessee-Chattanooga Win 7-6 1430.72 Feb 24th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
212 Auburn** Win 15-3 928.01 Ignored Feb 25th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
63 Tennessee Loss 9-10 1353.12 Feb 25th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
91 Tennessee-Chattanooga Win 15-3 1905.72 Feb 25th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
233 Alabama-Birmingham** Win 13-2 686.05 Ignored Mar 23rd Moxie Madness
139 Berry** Win 13-2 1535.61 Ignored Mar 23rd Moxie Madness
91 Tennessee-Chattanooga Win 13-4 1905.72 Mar 23rd Moxie Madness
199 Xavier** Win 13-3 1054.1 Ignored Mar 24th Moxie Madness
199 Xavier** Win 13-2 1054.1 Ignored Mar 24th Moxie Madness
91 Tennessee-Chattanooga Win 13-3 1905.72 Mar 24th Moxie Madness
139 Berry** Win 15-2 1535.61 Ignored Apr 13th Southeast D III Womens Conferences 2024
194 Georgia College** Win 15-1 1119.2 Ignored Apr 13th Southeast D III Womens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)