#174 Kentucky (4-6)

avg: 718.59  •  sd: 107.74  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
31 Alabama-Huntsville** Loss 4-13 1232.1 Ignored Feb 24th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
212 Auburn Win 10-3 928.01 Feb 24th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
211 Vanderbilt Win 8-6 632.69 Feb 24th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
63 Tennessee** Loss 1-13 878.12 Ignored Feb 24th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
162 Emory Loss 3-6 269.33 Feb 25th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
91 Tennessee-Chattanooga Loss 11-12 1180.72 Feb 25th The Only Tenn I See Memorial Tournament
235 Purdue-B** Win 7-2 651.23 Ignored Apr 13th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2024
190 Michigan-B Win 6-5 678.14 Apr 13th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2024
23 Notre Dame** Loss 0-7 1331.53 Ignored Apr 13th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2024
117 Michigan State Loss 6-11 566.18 Apr 14th Eastern Great Lakes D I Womens Conferences 2024
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)