#93 NYU (16-8)

avg: 1111.44  •  sd: 72.01  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
162 Colby Win 5-2 1259.76 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
235 Cornell-B** Win 6-0 720.28 Ignored Mar 1st Garden State 2025
138 Massachusetts Win 6-4 1163.72 Mar 1st Garden State 2025
138 Massachusetts Win 4-2 1294.27 Mar 2nd Garden State 2025
174 New Hampshire Win 6-3 1128.52 Mar 2nd Garden State 2025
86 Wellesley Loss 4-6 778.1 Mar 2nd Garden State 2025
185 SUNY-Stony Brook Win 8-3 1118.7 Mar 8th Strong Island Invitational
90 Williams Loss 4-6 752.98 Mar 8th Strong Island Invitational
139 Rutgers Loss 4-5 667.55 Mar 8th Strong Island Invitational
243 Columbia-B** Win 13-0 640.29 Ignored Mar 9th Strong Island Invitational
139 Rutgers Win 7-6 917.55 Mar 9th Strong Island Invitational
90 Williams Loss 4-9 518.59 Mar 9th Strong Island Invitational
243 Columbia-B** Win 15-0 640.29 Ignored Apr 12th Eastern Metro East D I Womens Conferences 2025
64 Connecticut Win 8-5 1772.87 Apr 12th Eastern Metro East D I Womens Conferences 2025
185 SUNY-Stony Brook Win 15-2 1118.7 Apr 12th Eastern Metro East D I Womens Conferences 2025
79 Columbia Win 10-7 1608.65 Apr 13th Eastern Metro East D I Womens Conferences 2025
64 Connecticut Loss 5-8 865.66 Apr 13th Eastern Metro East D I Womens Conferences 2025
79 Columbia Win 9-7 1498.32 Apr 26th Metro East D I College Womens Regionals 2025
34 Cornell Loss 3-13 1040.76 Apr 26th Metro East D I College Womens Regionals 2025
161 Syracuse Win 13-1 1263.31 Apr 26th Metro East D I College Womens Regionals 2025
139 Rutgers Win 11-5 1392.55 Apr 26th Metro East D I College Womens Regionals 2025
104 Yale Loss 8-10 777.97 Apr 27th Metro East D I College Womens Regionals 2025
112 SUNY-Binghamton Loss 6-9 551.45 Apr 27th Metro East D I College Womens Regionals 2025
139 Rutgers Win 7-3 1392.55 Apr 27th Metro East D I College Womens Regionals 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)