#196 UCLA-B (10-13)

avg: 468.07  •  sd: 58.52  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
180 Arizona Loss 4-7 41.44 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
220 Cal State-Long Beach Win 7-5 550.78 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
123 California-San Diego-B Loss 3-8 315.74 Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
30 UCLA** Loss 2-13 1118.34 Ignored Feb 1st Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
114 Arizona State Loss 5-12 355.88 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
220 Cal State-Long Beach Win 7-3 822.63 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
249 California-San Diego-C Win 10-2 580.44 Feb 2nd Presidents Day Qualifiers 2025
220 Cal State-Long Beach Loss 2-3 97.63 Mar 2nd Claremont Classic 2025
123 California-San Diego-B Loss 4-13 315.74 Mar 2nd Claremont Classic 2025
249 California-San Diego-C Win 5-2 580.44 Mar 2nd Claremont Classic 2025
145 Claremont-B Loss 3-8 129.25 Mar 2nd Claremont Classic 2025
220 Cal State-Long Beach Win 5-4 347.63 Mar 8th Gnomageddon
123 California-San Diego-B Win 3-2 1040.74 Mar 8th Gnomageddon
222 California-Santa Barbara-B Win 9-4 814.54 Mar 8th Gnomageddon
106 San Diego State Loss 4-9 439.72 Mar 8th Gnomageddon
83 California-Irvine Loss 5-9 665.7 Mar 9th Gnomageddon
123 California-San Diego-B Loss 3-5 497.18 Mar 9th Gnomageddon
165 Cal Poly-SLO-B Loss 9-10 511.05 Apr 12th Southwest Dev Womens Conferences 2025
123 California-San Diego-B Loss 6-11 369.05 Apr 12th Southwest Dev Womens Conferences 2025
249 California-San Diego-C Win 13-2 580.44 Apr 12th Southwest Dev Womens Conferences 2025
165 Cal Poly-SLO-B Loss 10-13 307.9 Apr 13th Southwest Dev Womens Conferences 2025
249 California-San Diego-C Win 11-6 527.14 Apr 13th Southwest Dev Womens Conferences 2025
263 Southern California-B** Win 13-2 42.47 Ignored Apr 13th Southwest Dev Womens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)