#17 Brown (18-9)

avg: 2055.26  •  sd: 62.93  •  top 16/20: 83.2%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
3 Carleton College Loss 9-11 2115.49 Jan 31st Florida Warm Up 2025
29 Pittsburgh Win 13-11 2107.65 Jan 31st Florida Warm Up 2025
12 Washington University Loss 4-13 1504.3 Jan 31st Florida Warm Up 2025
47 Emory Loss 11-13 1527.15 Feb 1st Florida Warm Up 2025
144 South Florida Win 13-9 1707.1 Feb 1st Florida Warm Up 2025
37 McGill Win 13-12 1943.23 Feb 1st Florida Warm Up 2025
47 Emory Win 13-8 2252.15 Feb 2nd Florida Warm Up 2025
44 Wisconsin Win 13-9 2195.79 Feb 2nd Florida Warm Up 2025
5 Colorado Loss 11-13 2130.07 Mar 1st Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
18 Georgia Loss 11-12 1913.84 Mar 1st Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
22 Penn State Win 13-11 2221.8 Mar 1st Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
11 Oregon State Loss 13-15 1921.55 Mar 1st Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
27 Minnesota Win 15-11 2272.95 Mar 2nd Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
14 Texas Win 15-13 2279.27 Mar 2nd Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
29 Pittsburgh Win 15-12 2179.3 Mar 2nd Smoky Mountain Invite 2025
18 Georgia Win 13-12 2163.84 Mar 29th Easterns 2025
2 Oregon Loss 10-13 2057.09 Mar 29th Easterns 2025
5 Colorado Loss 5-13 1758.91 Mar 29th Easterns 2025
59 James Madison Win 13-8 2165.89 Mar 29th Easterns 2025
48 North Carolina-Wilmington Win 15-7 2351.95 Mar 30th Easterns 2025
16 Northeastern Win 13-11 2285.53 Mar 30th Easterns 2025
18 Georgia Win 14-13 2163.84 Mar 30th Easterns 2025
385 New Hampshire** Win 15-1 802.59 Ignored Apr 12th Greater New England D I Mens Conferences 2025
20 Vermont Loss 11-12 1903.48 Apr 12th Greater New England D I Mens Conferences 2025
152 Rhode Island** Win 15-6 1868.42 Ignored Apr 12th Greater New England D I Mens Conferences 2025
134 Maine** Win 15-4 1924.57 Ignored Apr 13th Greater New England D I Mens Conferences 2025
37 McGill Win 12-11 1943.23 Apr 13th Greater New England D I Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

What is the uncertainty of the mean?
The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
What's the algorithm again?
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
Is there a longer explanation of all this?
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)