#327 Cal State-Long Beach (1-14)

avg: 582.29  •  sd: 113.82  •  top 16/20: 0%

Click on a column to sort  • 
# Opponent Result Game Rating Status Date Event
119 Cal Poly-SLO-B** Loss 4-13 767.2 Ignored Feb 8th Stanford Open Mens
261 Nevada-Reno Loss 5-11 231.64 Feb 8th Stanford Open Mens
211 UCLA-B Win 9-6 1443.86 Feb 9th Stanford Open Mens
157 Washington-B** Loss 5-13 640.2 Ignored Feb 9th Stanford Open Mens
276 Chico State Loss 4-13 184.1 Feb 9th Stanford Open Mens
107 Claremont** Loss 5-13 844.82 Ignored Mar 29th Southwest Showdown 2025
84 Southern California** Loss 2-13 919.35 Ignored Mar 29th Southwest Showdown 2025
199 Occidental Loss 8-11 709.44 Mar 29th Southwest Showdown 2025
199 Occidental Loss 5-13 475.05 Mar 30th Southwest Showdown 2025
211 UCLA-B Loss 6-11 478.6 Mar 30th Southwest Showdown 2025
6 Cal Poly-SLO** Loss 1-13 1667.97 Ignored Apr 12th SoCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
136 California-Irvine** Loss 2-13 720.22 Ignored Apr 12th SoCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
109 San Diego State** Loss 5-12 828.77 Ignored Apr 12th SoCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
41 California-San Diego** Loss 0-13 1192.31 Ignored Apr 12th SoCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
237 Loyola Marymount Loss 12-15 624.88 Apr 13th SoCal D I Mens Conferences 2025
**Blowout Eligible

FAQ

The uncertainty of the mean is equal to the standard deviation of the set of game ratings, divided by the square root of the number of games. We treated a team’s ranking as a normally distributed random variable, with the USAU ranking as the mean and the uncertainty of the ranking as the standard deviation
  1. Calculate uncertainy for USAU ranking averge
  2. Model ranking as a normal distribution around USAU averge with standard deviation equal to uncertainty
  3. Simulate seasons by drawing a rank for each team from their distribution. Note the teams in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  4. Sum the fractions for each region for how often each of it's teams appeared in the top 16 (club) or top 20 (college)
  5. Subtract one from each fraction for "autobids"
  6. Award remainings bids to the regions with the highest remaining fraction, subtracting one from the fraction each time a bid is awarded
There is an article on Ulitworld written by Scott Dunham and I that gives a little more context (though it probably was the thing that linked you here)